Everyone has tried many complicated and time consuming things to retrieve their rights that are secured by our const itutions, and to stop unconstitutional traffic tickets, taxes, prosecutions, foreclosures , depriving you of your second amendment right to arms and lawsuits. I will not go into all that has been tried, happened and failed. It would be too time consuming an d most would not understand. I will give a brief description of how this works. When you got your Social Security number, either you or your Mom or Dad checked off that you were a U.S. citizen on the SS – 5 application. And then you continued to claim to be a U.S. citizen throughout your life and did so on all of the government forms and applications when you which caused you to pay taxes, get tickets and every other act of treason that has happened to you.
The U.S. in this case, is the federal corporation the District of Columbia, also known as USDC or the UNITED STATES. It was created by the congressional act of 1871 . Also see 28 USC 3002 (15) “United States” means — (A) a Federal corporation;
So a U . S . citizen is a citizen of this federal corporation, and not a union State or USA republic. So now it’s easy to see that a U.S. citizen is a legal fiction / U.S. corporation and has no rights secured by the constitution. Only people have rights secured by the constitution, not legal fictions. You should have checked off “other” on the form because you are a State Citizen of your State that you were born in, which makes you a Citizen of all states, and one of the people, and a beneficiary of, the republic U. S.A. constitution of 1789/1791. A State Citizen used to be known as a Citizen of the United States before the Civil War, but the meaning has been changed twice for the purpose of fraud. The United States of America is the dejure republic government, not th e United States which is the corporation. The preamble to the
constitution establishes the United States of America, not the United States. So we have Two Different and Distinct National Governments . This treachery has always been the goal of the enemy.
See case law…. “The idea prevails with some, indeed it has expression in arguments at the bar, that we have in this country substantially two national governments ; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument , by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to… I take leave to say that, if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this court, a radical and mischievous change in our system will result. We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of legislative absolutism… It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside the Supreme Law of the Land finds lodgment in our Constitutional Jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this c ourt than to exert its full authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the Constitution.” — Honorable Supreme Court Justice John Harlan in the 1901 case of Downes v. Bidwell.
It’s all about your citizenship. It’s that simple.
See case law… “Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens.” Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.
U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) “The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.”
“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments i s distinct from the others , and each has citizens of it’s own …” United States v. Cruikshank , 92 U.S. 542 (1875) “…he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State,…” “One may be a citizen of a State an yet not a c itizen of the United States”. McDonel v. The State , 90 Ind. 320 (1883) “That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state,…” Tashiro v. Jordan , 201 Cal. 236 (1927) “A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government …” Kitchens v. Steele , 112 F.Supp 383
“Taxpayers are not [de jure] State Citizens.” Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10.
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: “the term ‘ citizen ‘ in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject’ in common law ; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.”
Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226: “The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights, nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship .” Supreme Court: US vs. Va lentine 288 F. Supp. 957: “The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States.”
The Amendment (14th) recognized that “an individual can be a Citizen of one of the sever al states without being a citizen of the United States,” (U.S. v. Anthony, 24 Fed. Cas. 829, 830), or, “a citizen of the United States without being a Citizen of a state.” (Slaughter – House Cases, supra; cf. U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 US 542, 549 (1875)). A more recent case is Crosse v. Bd. of Supervisors, 221 A.2d 431 (1966) which says : “Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citi zen of his state.” Citing U.S. v. Cruikshank, supra.
The courts presume you to be a federal citizen, without even telling you that there are different classes of citizens. It is up to you dispute this. Use your passport and the actual birth certificate. See…
“Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to inquire and determine a tax liability.” U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).
“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two c lasses of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state”. Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County , 160 Ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)
“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has under the other”. Colgate v. Harvey , 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct. 252 ( 1935)
“…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in state citizenship”. Madden v. Kentucky , 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)
“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the ci tizens of the United States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such”. Ruhstrat v. People , 57 N.E. 41 (1900)
“Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity “”, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
“…the first eight amendments have uniformly been held not to be protected from state action by the privilege and immunities clau se [of the 14th Amendment].” Hague v. CIO , 307 US 496, 520
“The right to trial by jury in civil cases, guaranteed by the 7th Amendment…and the right to bear arms guaranteed by the 2nd Amendment…have been distinctly held not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the 14th Amendment…and in effect the same decision was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution, except by indictment of a grand jury, contained in the 5th Amendment…and in respect of the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the 6th Amendment…it was held that the indictment, made indispensable by the 5th Amendment, and trial by jury guaranteed by the 6th Amendment,
were not privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the 14th Amendment. We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self – incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the 14th Amendment.” Twining v. New Jersey , 21 1 US 78, 98 – 99
“The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the Unite d States.” W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452
“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common – law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states .” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610 – 625. (1914)
There ARE ways to remedy your citizenship….. more to come and please read some Judge Anna von Reitz, Judge David Wynn Miller, Karl Lentz to name a few…. Ask questions and feel the power you take back as you become once again a member of WE THE PEOPLE…